In re Jonathan V.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Catherine M. DiDomenico, J.

On December 12, 2006, the Department of Probation filed a petition alleging that respondent, Jonathan V, violated the terms of his probation by associating with his former corespondent, Michael B. On December 13, 2006, respondent was arraigned and the Law Guardian moved to dismiss the violation petition as facially insufficient because the order of disposition does not contain a stated term or condition requiring respondent to stay away from Michael B. A written motion was submitted on December 14, 2006 and opposition was received the following…