People v. Fuller
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Fuchsberg, J.
This appeal, here by leave of a Judge of this court, presents us with our first opportunity to construe Penal Law sections authorizing the imposition of “restitution” or “reparation” as part of a sentence (Penal Law, §§ 60.27, 65.10, subd 2, par [g]). As recently amended, these stat*155utes, among other things, reflect both a more flexible penological approach and a heightened awareness of the “concerns and needs of the victims of crime” (Hechtman, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law, § 60.27). In particular, we are asked to decide…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. McgowenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by235 opinions
- People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. SparberNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. SammsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Robert Warner v. Orange County Department of ProbationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
230 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.