Legal Opinion

People v. Fuller

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1982PublishedCited by 235 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Fuchsberg, J.

This appeal, here by leave of a Judge of this court, presents us with our first opportunity to construe Penal Law sections authorizing the imposition of “restitution” or “reparation” as part of a sentence (Penal Law, §§ 60.27, 65.10, subd 2, par [g]). As recently amended, these stat*155utes, among other things, reflect both a more flexible penological approach and a heightened awareness of the “concerns and needs of the victims of crime” (Hechtman, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law, § 60.27). In particular, we are asked to decide…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. McgowenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by235 opinions

  1. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. SparberNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. People v. SammsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Robert Warner v. Orange County Department of ProbationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

230 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API