Legal Opinion
Chroniak v. Golden Investment Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 9, 1990No. 89-477PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 0Breyer, C.J.) has certified to us the following questions of law, see Sup. Ct. R. 34, concerning two loans made by the defendants, Golden Investment Corporation and its president, Armand Roberts, to the plaintiffs, Thomas Pugliese and his aunt Pauline Chroniak:
“1. Does RSA 398-A:3 apply to persons who, like defendants, are lenders but are not ‘in the business of second mortgage loans?’ RSA 398-A:l-a.
“2. If the answer to the first question is yes, are loans made by a corporation formed to engage in real estate investment nonetheless…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Appeal of Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Greenhalge v. Town of DunbartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- State Employees' Ass'n v. Board of Trustees of the UniversitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Dover Professional Fire Officers Ass'n v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State Employees' Ass'n of New Hampshire, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- LaChance v. United States Smokeless Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Smith v. Alice Peck Day Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
- Chroniak v. Golden Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.