Legal Opinion
Chroniak v. Golden Investment Corp.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 21, 1993No. 91-2343, 92-1121, 92-1317 and 92-1318PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Armand Roberts and Golden Investment Corporation challenge the district court’s interpretation of three New Hampshire statutes regulating lending and debt collection practices. Appellee Thomas Pugliese cross-appeals from the district court order disallowing an award of attorney fees. We affirm the district court judgment and remand for reconsideration of the application for attorney fees.
I
BACKGROUND
In June 1986, Armand Roberts and Golden Investment Corporation loaned Pugliese $75,000 with which to arrange his release on bail. Pugliese and his aunt, Pauline…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Richard F. Davet v. Enrico MacCaroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Julia Prewitt Brown v. Trustees of Boston UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Curtis Manufacturing Co. v. Plasti-Clip Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
- Barden v. HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Washington v. St. Albans Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1998
- Pauline Chroniak and Thomas Pugliese v. Golden Investment Corp. And Armand Roberts, Thomas Pugliese v. Golden Investment Corp. And Armand Roberts, Thomas Pugliese v. Golden Investment Corp. And Armand Roberts, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Boone v. Spangler Automated . . .District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.