Legal Opinion

State Employees' Ass'n of New Hampshire, Inc. v. State

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 6, 1986No. 84-546PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.

This interlocutory transfer without ruling from the Superior Court (Cann, J.) poses the question whether employees of the New Hampshire Pari-Mutuel Commission who fill seasonal positions must normally work at least 37-1/2 hours each week in order to qualify under RSA 98-A:3 for the full benefits of permanent State employees. The answer is yes.

The issue turns on the application of several related sections of RSA chapter 98-A. Two sections of that statute deal with the provision of benefits to State employees who fill seasonal positions. See RSA 98-A:3, :6. In order to be eligible for benefits…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Greenhalge v. Town of DunbartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. Hamby v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Dover Professional Fire Officers Ass'n v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Upson v. Board of Trustees of New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pennelli v. Town of PelhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. United States v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. State v. CrieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. Chroniak v. Golden Investment Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. Greenland Conservation Commission v. New Hampshire Wetlands CouncilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API