State Employees' Ass'n of New Hampshire, Inc. v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
This interlocutory transfer without ruling from the Superior Court (Cann, J.) poses the question whether employees of the New Hampshire Pari-Mutuel Commission who fill seasonal positions must normally work at least 37-1/2 hours each week in order to qualify under RSA 98-A:3 for the full benefits of permanent State employees. The answer is yes.
The issue turns on the application of several related sections of RSA chapter 98-A. Two sections of that statute deal with the provision of benefits to State employees who fill seasonal positions. See RSA 98-A:3, :6. In order to be eligible for benefits…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Greenhalge v. Town of DunbartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Hamby v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Dover Professional Fire Officers Ass'n v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Upson v. Board of Trustees of New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pennelli v. Town of PelhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- United States v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- State v. CrieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Chroniak v. Golden Investment Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Greenland Conservation Commission v. New Hampshire Wetlands CouncilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.