Legal Opinion
Dudley v. Hannaford Bros. Co.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 14, 2002No. 1:01-cr-00041PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SINGAL, District Judge.
Employees of a Shop ‘n Save supermarket operated by Defendant Hannaford Bros, refused to sell alcohol to Plaintiff David Dudley, who suffers from a handicap that gives him the outward appearance of being intoxicated. Dudley sued Hanna-ford Bros, for violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act and the Maine Human Rights Act. After a non-jury trial, the parties submitted post-trial briefs (Docket # 36, 38) and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (Docket # 37, 39). Pursuant to Rule 52(a), the Court makes the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- PGA Tour, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Richard Jacques v. Clean-Up Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Soileau v. Guilford of Maine, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dudley v. Hannaford Bros.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Beaulieu v. the Aube Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Harding v. CIANBRO CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Cutting v. Down East Orthopedic Associates, P.A.District Court, D. Maine · 2017
- Burris v. Richards Paving, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.