Stickel v. Durfee
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
J. — The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment which was rendered against them, pursuant to the verdict of a jury. This is a suit for damages resulting from an automobile collision. A motion for new trial was denied. The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court committed error in refusing the only instruction proffered on the subject of the discretion required to be exercised by one who is suddenly confronted with imminent peril. It is conceded the refused instruction properly stated the rule of law, if it is applicable to the facts adduced by the evidence. The appellant contends…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fischer v. KeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Brooks v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Emery v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Dougherty v. EllingsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Varner v. SkovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Leming v. Oilfields Trucking Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Leo v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hook v. Point Montara Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Billeter v. Rhodes & Jamieson, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.