Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Schwartz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1997No. 16214PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Gary Schwartz appeals from a judgment awarding $5,000 in “earnest money” to plaintiffs-appellees Hobart and Charlene Cochran after Schwartz defaulted in his contract to purchase a duplex from the Cochrans for $69,000. Schwartz contends that the trial court erred when it awarded the Cochrans the earnest money without finding that they had actually sustained damage as a result of Schwartz’s default.

Although the issue is not free from difficulty, we agree with the trial court that the Cochrans were entitled to the earnest money. Accordingly, the judgment of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curtin v. OgbornAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Bruce Builders, Inc. v. GoodwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Higgs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Ottenstein v. Western Reserve AcademyOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Windsor v. Riback, 2007-G-2775 (4-25-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Peto v. RuschakOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Gaskins v. Young, Unpublished Decision (5-28-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API