Legal Opinion

Higgs v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 15, 1976No. 250-75PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDureee, Senior Judge

Plaintiffs seek to recover $91,000 paid to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in accordance with a contract by which plaintiffs intended to purchase, and HUD intended to sell, two parcels of realty located in Texas (designated Hampton Place I and II). In response to HUD’s invitation to bid, plaintiffs submitted 'a sales contract prepared by HUD as the bid form. Both the invitation to bid and the top of the first page of the sales contract described or identified the project by number, and as Hampton Place I and II. It is undisputed that both parties at the time of execution…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wise v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Davy v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Barnette v. SayersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  2. Loesch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Jennie-O Foods, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  4. Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. United States v. SwansonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API