Legal Opinion
San Franciscans for Reasonable Growth v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1987No. A033640PublishedCited by 17 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, Acting P. J.
—Plaintiff, San Franciscans for Reasonable Growth (SFRG), appeals from a judgment denying its petition for a writ of administrative mandate and from an order dismissing its claims made under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.)
This dispute involves a historic San Francisco restaurant, Hoffman’s Grill. In 1981 the Hoffman’s building was designated a landmark structure by the city. The Hoffman’s building occupies part of an irregular parcel (bounded on the northwest by Market Street, on the southeast by Stevenson…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Mitchell v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Lapica v. EIGHTH JUDICIAL DIST. COURT, ETC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by17 opinions
- Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- County Sanitation District No. 2 v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Silverado Modjeska Recreation & Park District v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- McCormick v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.