Frink v. Carman Distributing Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as Frink, defendant in error as the Carman Company, and the Zott Laundry Company as the Zott Compány.
’. The Carman Company brought this suit against Frink on his, statutory liability as a holder of unpaid stock of the Zott Company. The cause was tried to the court, which found for the Carman Company and entered judgment accordingly. To review that judgment Frink prosecutes this writ. Briefly stated the assignments present the following contentions: (1) Frink is not liable under the statute; (2) creditors had full knowledge of the plan under which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- John W. Cooney Co. v. Arlington Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1918
- Sedgwick City Bank v. Sedgwick Milling and Elevator, Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Barnard v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bowman v. MelnickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936