Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Margaret M.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 2006No. B184836PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*532Opinion

COOPER, P. J.

This appeal is from the termination of Margaret’s (Mother) parental rights over Fernando. Mother and Fernando correctly argue that the juvenile court should have selected legal guardianship as Femando’s permanent plan instead of adoption because, notwithstanding the strong presumption in favor of adoption, the peculiar facts of this case demonstrate a compelling reason for finding that termination of parental rights would be detrimental to Femando and exceptional circumstances warrant selecting legal guardianship as his permanent plan.

In the unpublished portion of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Derek W. v. David W.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Rosi M.California Court of Appeal · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. C.K.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Madera County Department of Social Services v. N.M.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. C.T. (In re C.A.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. In re A.D. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. In re A.R. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API