Legal Opinion
San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Rosi M.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 4, 2003No. D041731; No. D042607PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1292Opinion
McDONALD, J.
In this consolidated proceeding Rosi M., the mother of Rachel M., appeals the termination of her parental rights pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26,2 and Rachel, joined by Rosi, petitions this court for a writ of error coram vobis to vacate the judgment based on new evidence. In her appeal, Rosi contends there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that Rachel was likely to be adopted, and the juvenile court erred by not applying the beneficial relationship exception to adoption. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A).) In her petition, Rachel urges us to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Daniels v. RobbinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Margaret M.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Madera County Department of Social Services v. N.M.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Contra Costa Cnty. Children v. J.D. (In re B.D.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In re Damien v. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.