Legal Opinion

Buehner v. Sehlhorst

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pattisoet, J.,

delivered, the opinion of the Court.

An action was brought in this case against the appellees by the appellant upon the following promissory note, endorsed by the defendants:

“$1,000.00. Baltimore, April 21st, 1921.

On demand six months after date we promise to pay to the order of H. Gr. Buehner,

One thousand-00/100 Dollars. at 244 NT. Liberty St.

No............. Due............10% interest. Value received.

Interstate Optical Company,

R. H. Sehlhorst, Sec’ty.”

To the declaration each of the defendants filed the pleas of never indebted and never promised as alleged. The court, sitting as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grandison v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  2. McDonald v. LuckenbachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  3. Hutton v. MarxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  4. Nolan v. H. E. Wilcox Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Traber v. TraberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ewing v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Robinson v. Lancaster Foundry Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Moriarty v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API