Hoopes v. Hammargren

OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, J.:

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of respondent, Dr. Lonnie Hammargren. While Dr. Hammargren asserts that his alleged conduct did not constitute actionable malpractice, Ms. Hoopes contends that there are genuine issues of fact to be decided at trial relating to her claim of malpractice (which include misdiagnosis, mistreatment and sexual advantage of the physician-patient relationship)'. Further, while Hammar-gren urges that Ms. Hoopes’ action was untimely filed, she argues on appeal that her action is not barred by the controlling…