Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1928No. 20945. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. It was brought under the Federal employers ’ liability act which by the merchant marine act was made applicable to seamen. The cause was tried to the court and a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $5,000. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial were interposed, both of which were overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which the defendant appeals.

The accident happened March 3, 1926. At this time the ship Milan Maru was being loaded in the harbor at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Reed v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Lehigh Valley R. v. DoktorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGinn v. North Coast Stevedoring Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Christie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Tenneson v. Kadiak Fisheries Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Cross v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ranstrom v. International Stevedoring Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API