Legal Opinion
Teamsters Local Union No. 430 v. Cement Express, Inc., Lehigh Portland Cement Company Herman Brothers, Inc. And Bulk, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 7, 1988No. 87-5665PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
Teamsters Local Union No. 430 appeals from a district court order granting the motions of defendants Herman Brothers, Inc. and Bulk, Inc. for an award of counsel fees as sanctions against Local 430 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. The defendant companies succeeded on their motions for summary judgment in the underlying action brought by Local 430 under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, to enforce an arbitration award against Herman Brothers and Bulk. We affirmed. Teamsters Local Union No. 430 v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Albert J. Gaiardo and Patricia Gaiardo, His Wife v. Ethyl Corporation, A/K/A Ethyl Corporation, Visqueen DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Eavenson, Auchmuty & Greenwald v. HoltzmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mars Steel Corp. v. Continental Bank N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Mary Ann Pensiero, Inc. v. LingleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Mellon Bank Corporation and Mellon Bank, N.A., in No. 90-3712 v. First Union Real Estate Equity and Mortgage Investments, in No. 90-3790Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- No. 93-5080Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.