Hanna v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Finney District Court. Thomas K. Hanna, Oscar L. Woodgate, and. Frank T. Rhoades, administrators of the estate of Milton Tootle, and. Thomas K. Hanna, Oscar L. Woodgate, and Frank T. Rhoades, surviving partners of the firm of Tootle, Hanna & Company, bring here for review an order made by the district judge, on March 25, 1887, dissolving an attachment in their action against Charles P. Barrett.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Holt, C.:
The plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs, brought an action in the Finney district court, upon an account for goods sold, filed an affidavit and bond, and caused an attachment to issue therein. The attachment was levied upon the goods of the defendant. Afterward he filed a motion *447to dissolve the attachment; the motion was heard and sustained, and the attachment was dissolved. -The plaintiffs bring the case here for review.
At the hearing of the motion to dissolve the attachment the plaintiffs offered the depositions of the defendant and of Amanda L. Barrett .his wife, which…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Charles Mix County Bank v. CaltaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Wolbol v. SteinhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1917
- Bank of Santa Fe v. Haskell County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Bartlett v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Chubbuck v. BeatySupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.