Legal Opinion

Charles Mix County Bank v. Calta

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1922No. File No. 5090PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.

This action was begun to foreclose a third mortgage on real estate securing’ the payment of a promissory note of $8,000, given by defendants to plaintiff and for a deficiency judgment against defendants. It appears that the value of the mortgaged property does not exceed $9,600, and that the two prior mortgages aggregate the principal sum of $7,000, besides a large, amount of accrued interest ánd taxes.

During the pendency of the action and before trial plaintiff secured a warrant of attachment in this action, and caused defendants’ stock of hardware and fixtures to be attached. The defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duxbury v. DahleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Hanna v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Adams v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Schweigel v. L. A. Shakman Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Golden Valley County v. CurtinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Metro Rentals, Inc. v. WagnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. WahlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API