Legal Opinion

Wolbol v. Steinhoff

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1917No. 897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the District Court, Albany County; HoN. V. J.. Tidball, Judge. Action by Sarah Steinhoff, et al., against Katrine Wolbol, as executrix. Judgment for plaintiffs and defendant brings error. The material facts are stated in the opinion. Wolbol succeeded to all rights of the original entryman and of Lewis and the bank and held the same at the time of the land office proceedings, but the holders of the Dean title had no notice or knowledge of the land office proceedings.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the District Court, Albany County; HoN. V. J.. Tidball, Judge. Action by Sarah Steinhoff, et al., against Katrine Wolbol, as executrix. Judgment for plaintiffs and defendant brings error. The material facts are stated in the opinion. Wolbol succeeded to all rights of the original entryman and of Lewis and the bank and held the same at the time of the land office proceedings, but the holders of the Dean title had no notice or knowledge of the land office proceedings. The rule that a decision of the land department relating to public lands and conducted upon notice is conclusive is…

1Opinion of the Court

Potter, Chief Justice.

This action was commenced on October 5, 1903, by Philip A. Steinhoff against Mads Wolbol to recover as damages the alleged value of the hay and grass grown upon a tract of land described as the southwest quarter of section 11, in township 15 north, of range 78 west of the sixth principal meridian, situated in the County of Albany, in this state, and the issues and profits of said land, alleged to have been taken and converted by the defendant to his own use during the period from on or about August 18, 1890, to August 3) I9°3-

The petition alleges that the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Quinby v. ConlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Cornelius v. KesselSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Hawley v. DillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Guaranty Savings Bank v. BladowSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Radalj v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Coffee v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Rohlfing v. Moses Akiona, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Paul v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Cheyenne v. PuckettWyoming Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API