Legal Opinion

State v. Dillard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1988No. 8729SC1241PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Defendant brings forward five assignments of error. First, he contends the trial court erred by denying his motion to quash the indictment. Second, he assigns error to the State’s use of leading questions during the direct examination of the victim. Defendant’s third assignment of error is that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss at the close of the evidence. Fourth, he assigns error to the court’s jury instruction that the offense could have been committed any time during the month of November 1985. Finally, defendant contends the trial court erred in its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. HigginbottomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. MoormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RuffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. In re M.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API