Legal Opinion

Hill v. Babcock & Wilcox

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 15, 2021No. 5:20-cv-01428Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ROBIN HILL, ) CASE NO. 5:20-cv-1428 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) JUDGE SARA LIOI ) vs. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER BABCOCK & WILCOX, ) ) ) DEFENDANT. ) Before the Court is the motion for partial judgment on the pleadings filed by defendant Babcock & Wilcox (“B&W”) seeking to dismiss Count III of the complaint. (Doc. No. 7 [“PMJP”].) Plaintiff Robin Hill (“Hill”) opposes the motion (Doc. No. 9 [“Opp’n”]), and B&W has filed a reply (Doc. No. 10 [“Reply”]). For the reasons set forth herein, the motion is granted and Count III is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API