Legal Opinion
Margaret Crosby v. Joan Crosby, General Motors Corporation Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Margaret Crosby v. Joan Crosby General Motors Corporation Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1993No. 92-1500Published
1Opinion of the Court
986 F.2d 79
16 Employee Benefits Cas. 1742
Margaret CROSBY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joan CROSBY, Defendant-Appellant,
General Motors Corporation; Metropolitan Life Insurance
Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Margaret CROSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joan CROSBY; General Motors Corporation; Metropolitan Life
Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 92-1500, 92-1501.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued Nov. 30, 1992.
Decided Feb. 17, 1993.
Michael Lawrence Marshall, Schlachman, Belsky & Weiner, P.A., Baltimore, MD, argued for appellant.
Richard Jay Hackerman, Baltimore, MD, Joseph Trovato,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Dorothy T. Makar Anthony L. Makar, Her Husband v. Health Care Corporation of the Mid-Atlantic (Carefirst) Provident Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Kelly Health Care, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.