Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family v. C. G.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 2005No. B175094PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, P. J.

In this appeal, mother C. G. (mother) challenges the court order appointing a legal guardian for her daughter C. G. (C. G.), in part because the court improperly appointed a guardian ad litem to act for mother in the dependency proceedings. We conclude the guardian ad litem appointment violated mother’s due process rights and requires reversal of the underlying order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

C. G. was detained by the Los Angeles Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) in September 2002. Her mother and father were using drugs and were not properly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. People v. MastersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re James F.California Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Enrique G.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Marcus M.California Supreme Court · 2008
  4. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Athena V.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. In Re Jaclyn S.California Court of Appeal · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API