Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Marcus M.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2008No. S150316PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

In a dependency case (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 et seq.), the juvenile court may terminate a parent’s interest in a child’s companionship, care, and custody after the child has been removed from the parent’s home, efforts to reunify the family have failed, and adoption has been identified as the permanent placement goal. (Id., § 366.26, subd. (b)(1); see In re Celine R. (2003) 31 Cal.4th 45, 52-53 [1 Cal.Rptr.3d 432, 71 P.3d 787].) Because a basic civil right of the parent is thus at stake (In re Marilyn H. (1993) 5 Cal.4th 295, 306 [19 Cal.Rptr.2d 544, 851 P.2d 826]),…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re James F.California Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API