Legal Opinion

People v. Masterson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1994No. S039341PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

—Over the objection of his client, defense counsel stipulated to use of an 11-person jury in a hearing to determine whether defendant was competent to stand trial for felony charges. We must decide whether counsel was authorized to do so. Because of the nature of competency proceedings and of the right to a jury trial in those proceedings, we conclude that counsel has authority to waive entirely a jury trial over defendant’s objection. This includes within it lesser authority such as that exercised in this case.

Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. McPetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. MedinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. LawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. LightseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. BlackburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. D'ArcyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API