Legal Opinion

Caylor v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1929No. 3 Div. 865PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER J.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals, as expressed in this case on this and former appeal (21 Ala. App. 627, 111 So. 195), and in the case of Higginbothan v. State, 20 Ala. App. 476, 103 So. 71, and Spears v. State, 21 Ala. App. 129, 106 So. 72, is that section 4491 of the Code means that the venue of the prosecution there referred to is in the county in which there is a breach of duty to support the wife and (or) children. A careful consideration of said Code section discloses that it is in form a legislative direction as to what shall be held as to the place of the commission of cm…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. State v. DvoracekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Fleming v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Higgenbotham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Phelps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  2. In re AlexanderSuperior Court of Delaware · 1944
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. General Securities Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Swindle v. State Ex Rel. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Nelson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API