Legal Opinion
In Re Appeal of Chase
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 28, 2009No. 2008-191PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Dr. David Chase appeals the decision and judgment of the Medical Practice Board concluding that he engaged in unprofessional conduct in evaluating and recommending several patients for cataract surgery. The State cross-appeals, arguing that the Board should have found that Dr. Chase’s conduct included a willful violation of the statutory prohibition against filing false reports. We affirm.
¶ 2. Dr. Chase practiced general ophthalmology, with a focus on the diagnosis and surgical removal of cataracts, in the Burlington area for over thirty years. In July 2003, the State moved to summarily…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Appeals of LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Braun v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Perry v. Medical Practice BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Brown v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Wendell v. Union Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Jon Porter, M.D.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Condosta v. CondostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Condosta v. CondostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- In Re MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Chase v. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICESSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.