Legal Opinion

Condosta v. Condosta

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 2, 1982No. 539-81PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of Windham Superior Court granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the subsequent denial of plaintiff’s motion to vacate the order. We affirm.

This case is the fourth attempt by plaintiff to obtain various forms of relief from what he apparently conceives to be injustices growing out of divorce proceedings between the parties. Defendant here was the plaintiff in the original action. Condosta v. Condosta, 186 Vt. 360, 395 A.2d 345 (1978). See also Condosta v. Condosta, 136 Vt. 630, 388 A.2d 33 (1978) (mem.); Condosta v. Condosta, 139 Vt. 545, 431…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Field v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  2. Condosta v. CondostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. Condosta v. CondostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  4. Heaton v. SawyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  5. In Re Appeal of ChaseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Milligan v. MilliganSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  2. In re J.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Whippie v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  4. Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. Estate of Girard v. LairdSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API