Legal Opinion
In Re Miller
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 6, 2009No. 2009-222PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Mitchell R. Miller, M.D. appeals from a decision of the Medical Practice Board to suspend his medical license pending a ruling on the merits on multiple charges of unprofessional conduct. Dr. Miller contends: (1) the statutory provision authorizing summary suspensions, 3 V.S.A. § 814(c), is unconstitutional on its face because it fails to provide for a pre-suspension hearing or a prompt and meaningful post-suspension hearing; (2) the statute as applied failed to comport with due process because the post-suspension hearing afforded no meaningful opportunity to present evidence and contest…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Luck Brothers v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Firefighters of Brattleboro v. Brattleboro Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Miriam Lowell and Seth Healey v. Department for Children and FamiliesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- Friends of Pine Street d/b/a Pine Street Coalition v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Fitzgerald v. DemlVermont Superior Court · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.