Legal Opinion
Helm v. Childers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 18, 1938No. 27985PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, .1.
Ennis C. Helm, as publicity director of the State Travel and Tourist Bureau, seeks in this original action a writ of mandamus to require the respondents to issue a salary warrant to him in the sum of $250, for the month of June, 1937.
The position was created by H. B. 273, 16th Legislature, art. 11. ch. 50, S. L. 1937, p. 373. The Highway Commission, as authorized, fixed the salary and made the appointment. The act authorizes payment of the salary “from the State Highway Construction and Maintenance Fund.”
It is contended on behalf of respondents that the act attempts to appropriate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Hawks v. BlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- State ex rel. Douglas County v. CornellNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. State Reclamation Board v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Democratic Party of Oklahoma v. EstepSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Burkhardt v. City of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Way v. Grand Lake Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Board of Comr's v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Brown v. City of Warr AcresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.