Legal Opinion

Ferry v. Protective Indemnity Co. of New York

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1944No. Appeal, 108PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This action in assumpsit involves the coverage of a motor vehicle liability policy. Defendant denied coverage, and plaintiffs brought this action for reimbursement. The case was tried by a judge of the County Court of Allegheny County, without a jury, and judgment was rendered for defendant. Plaintiffs’ motion to open judgment and to have judgment entered on the whole record was refused. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The question before us is one of law, as the facts are not in dispute, the parties having submitted the case on an agreed statement pursuant to Rule 56 of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stammer v. KitzmillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hesse v. Traveler's Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Wheeler v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Humphreys v. Nat'l Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. Of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Raffel v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. August A. Busch & Co. of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. U.S. Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  5. Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Travelers Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API