Legal Opinion

Morgan v. East

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1892No. 479PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Greene Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new trial is assigned as error.

In the motion the causes for a new trial stated were that the court erred in overruling the appellant’s motion to strike out certain testimony; that it erred in excluding certain testimony; that the decision of the court was not sustained by sufficient evidence, and that the decision of the cour, was contrary to law.

For the presentation to this court of the questions embraced in the assignment of error a bill of exceptions is necessary.

It is insisted on behalf of the appellee that a bill of exceptions contained in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hull v. LouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hormann v. HartmetzIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Loy v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Shulse v. McWilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Guirl v. GillettIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. IslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railroad v. LynchIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Elwood Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API