Legal Opinion

National Audubon Society, Inc. Golden Gate Audubon Society, Inc. Marin Audubon Society, Inc. Muir Beach Enviro, Inc. California Waterfowl Association, Inc., and National Trappers Association, Inc. California Trappers Association, Inc. Tim Wion Christopher S. Brennan Loyd E. Horn, Intervenors v. Gray Davis, Governor of California Douglas Wheeler, Resources Secretary, State of California Jacqueline E. Schafer, Director, Cdfg California Department of Fish & Game California Fish & Game Commission, and Ann M. Veneman, U.S. Department of Agriculture Gary Simmons, California State Director, Wildlife Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture Jamie Clark Rappaport, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Anne Badgley, Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Am Soc Prev Cruelty Protect Pets and Wildlife/vote Yes on Proposition 4 Animal Protection Institute the Ark Trust, Inc. Doris Day Animal League the Fund for Animals the Humane Society of the United States International Fund for Animal Welfare, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. National Audubon Society, Inc. Golden Gate Audubon Society, Inc. Marin Audubon Society, Inc. Muir Beach Enviro, Inc. California Waterfowl Association, Inc., and National Trappers Association, Inc. California Trappers Association, Inc. Tim Wion Christopher S. Brennan Loyd E. Horn, Intervenors-Appellants v. Gray Davis, Governor of California Douglas Wheeler, Resources Secretary, State of California Jacqueline E. Schafer, Director, Cdfg California Department of Fish & Game California Fish & Game Commission, and Ann M. Veneman, U.S. Department of Agriculture Gary Simmons, California State Director, Wildlife Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture Gale A. Norton, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior Jamie Clark Rappaport, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Anne Badgley, Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Robert Stanton, Director, National Park Service, Am Soc Prev Cruelty Protect Pets and Wildlife/vote Yes on Proposition 4 Animal Protection Institute the Ark Trust, Inc. Doris Day Animal League the Fund for Animals the Humane Society of the United States International Fund for Animal Welfare, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees. National Audubon Society, Inc. Golden Gate Audubon Society, Inc. Marin Audubon Society, Inc. Muir Beach Enviro, Inc. California Waterfowl Association, Inc. v. Gray Davis, Governor of California Mary D. Nichols, Resources Secretary, State of California Robert C. Hight, Director of the California Department of Fish and Game California Department of Fish and Game California Fish & Game Commission, Ann M. Veneman, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture Gary Simmons, California State Director, Wildlife Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture Gale A. Norton, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior Jamie Clark Rappaport, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Robert Stanton, Director, National Park Service, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Animal Protection Institute the Ark Trust, Inc. Doris Day Animal League the Fund for Animals Humane Society of the United States Protect Pets and Wildlife/vote Yes on Proposition 4 the International Fund for Animal Welfare, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 24, 2002No. 01-15159PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

307 F.3d 835

NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY, INC.; Golden Gate Audubon Society, Inc.; Marin Audubon Society, Inc.; Muir Beach Enviro, Inc.; California Waterfowl Association, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and

National Trappers Association, Inc.; California Trappers Association, Inc.; Tim Wion; Christopher S. Brennan; Loyd E. Horn, Intervenors,

v.

Gray DAVIS, Governor of California; Douglas Wheeler, Resources Secretary, State of California; Jacqueline E. Schafer, Director, CDFG; California Department of Fish & Game; California Fish & Game Commission, Defendants, and

Ann M. Veneman,* U.S. Department of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Angela Bernhardt v. Los Angeles County Lloyd W. Pellman, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Maya v. Centex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Lozano v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Association Des Eleveurs De Canards Et D'Oies Du Quebec v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API