Legal Opinion

Maya v. Centex Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 21, 2011No. 10-55658, 10-55660, 10-55662, 10-55663, 10-55664, 10-55665, 10-55667, 10-55668PublishedCited by 547 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

B. FLETCHER:

This case arises against the backdrop of the national housing crisis. Nationwide, foreclosures are increasing, construction and purchase of new homes is decreasing, and home values are plummeting. 1 In some ways, the facts presented here echo national trends, but we decide a fairly narrow question: whether individuals who purchased homes in new developments have standing to sue the developers for injuries allegedly caused by the developers’ practice of marketing neighboring homes to individuals who presented a high risk of foreclosure and abandonment of their homes,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by547 opinions

  1. Cathleen Silha v. ACT, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Josh Finkelman v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  4. National Council of La Raza v. Barbara CegavskeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Leonard Cottrell v. Alcon LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

542 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API