Legal Opinion

Ronald Mancini and Cheryl Mancini, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Redland Insurance Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2001No. 20-1488PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Redland Insurance Company is a private insurer that administers federally subsidized flood insurance pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4001-4041, 4071-4129. The plaintiffs, Ronald and Cheryl Mancini, brought this suit when Redland denied their claim for flood damage to their mobile home. The District Court found for the plaintiffs, but awarded them only part of the damages requested. Redland appeals, and the Mancinis cross-appeal. We hold that the Mancinis’ failure to submit a signed and sworn proof of loss entitles Redland to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Gowland v. AetnaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. MARSEILLES HOMEOWNERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Fidelity Nat. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. Eduardo Sans v. U.S. Security Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Ferraro v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. Allen B. Suopys v. Omaha Property & CasualtyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Glenn Gunter v. Farmers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API