Legal Opinion
Allen B. Suopys v. Omaha Property & Casualty
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 15, 2005No. 04-1996PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
Allen B. Suopys (“Suopys”) appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting summary judgment in favor of Omaha Property & Casualty (“Omaha”). Suopys claims that he sustained property losses that are covered by the Standard Flood Insurance Policy (“SFIP”) issued to him by Omaha in its capacity as a “Write-Your-Own” Program Company participant in the National Flood Insurance Program (“NFIP”). This appeal presents the question of whether under the SFIP, the 60-day period for filing proof of loss, including the filing of an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gowland v. AetnaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Irene Flick v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- M.D. Phelps and Irene K. Phelps v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Kolbe v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Jacobson v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Migliaro v. Fidelity National Indemnity Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Wulf v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Greer v. Owners InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.