Schulte v. Pfaudler Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Case by August Schulte against the Pfaudler Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff entered into the employ of defendant when he was past 22 years of age. He worked several weeks in the latter part of 1902. He was then sick for a time. He returned to work about the first of *428January, 1903, and worked until April 30th, when he got his arm in the cogs of a punching machine upon which he was at work, receiving injuries which resulted in the loss of his arm. This suit was brought to recover damages for said injuries. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of defendant. The case is brought here by writ of error.
The declaration claims in substance :(1) That…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Swick v. Ætna Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Sipes v. Michigan Starch Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Berlin v. William B. Mershon & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Mushinski v. VincentMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klotz v. Power & Mining Machinery Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Neifert v. MetlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Edward v. Grand Haven Basket FactoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1915