Legal Opinion

United States v. Bell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 20, 2004No. 03-60253, 03-60254PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:

Co-Appellants, J.D. Bell and Charles Cotton, were convicted in separate jury trials of the crime of aggravated sexual abuse on an Indian Reservation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1151, 1153(a), 2241(a) and 2246(2). Their appeals were consolidated by this Court. On appeal, Bell and Cotton raise one similar issue and several separate issues. We reject all of Bell’s contentions on appeal and therefore affirm his conviction. We also reject most of Cotton’s contentions, however, we hold that Cotton’s Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right was violated but this error was…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. United States v. BashamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Joseph EbronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API