Legal Opinion

Stoudinger v. City of Newark

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On order to show cause why an injunction should not issue. Hearing on bill, answer and affidavits.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

The government of the city of Newark, by an ordinance duly adopted on the 7th day of July, 1876, ordained that a sewer should be constructed from the westerly line of High street to the Passaic river, and that the waters of Mill brook, on. First river, should be diverted from their present channel into the sewer and carried by. it to the Passaic river. The sewer, for most of the distance between the termini named, is to be laid in Clay street. The charter gives the municipal government full power to lay out, regulate and repair streets, to construct sewers and drains in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milhau v. SharpNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Chapman v. Albany & Schenectady RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Milhau v. SharpNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Dean v. SavageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hulett v. Sea GirtNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API