Dean v. Savage
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Assumpsit. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSaneord, J.
This is an action of assumpsit against, two defendants, Savage and Mann, charging them as partners under the name of B. E. Mann & Go., and as indorsers of a promissory note payable to that firm or order, to which is added the common count for money lent. The defendants pleaded the general issue, and the superior court found the issue and rendered judgment in favor of Savage and against Mann.
Mann now contends that such judgment is erroneous, because the promises declared on are laid as the joint promises of both of the defendants, while the finding of the court, that Savage never made them,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kinney v. FarnsworthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
- Nash v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
- Benedict v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fraser v. HenningerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Woodruff v. PerrottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Stoudinger v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1877