Legal Opinion

James v. GETTY OIL CO.(EAST. OPERATIONS)

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 4, 1984PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’HARA, Judge.

The instant case is a consolidation of several actions, all of which involve a dispute between Getty Refining and Marketing Co. (“Getty”) and Catalytic, Inc. (“Catalytic”) concerning an indemnity clause included in a contract between Getty Oil Company (Eastern Operations), Inc., predecessor to Getty, and Catalytic.

Article VII of the Delaware Refinery Maintenance Contract (“Contract”), which covers the parties’ respective liabilities for various phases of their ongoing business relationship, states as follows:

There shall be excluded from the costs includible in the compensation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moore v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Sweetman v. Strescon Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1978
  3. State v. Interstate Amiesite CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  4. Baio v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  5. Marshall v. Maryland, Delaware, & Virginia Railway Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brandt v. Hicks, Muse & Co. (In Re Healthco International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  2. Fina, Inc. v. ArcoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Valley Forge Insurance v. JeffersonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986
  4. Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992
  5. Alcoa World Alumina LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API