Legal Opinion

Baio v. Commercial Union Insurance

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 21, 1979PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuffy, Justice

(for the majority):

The issue in this case concerns the right of an insurance company to recover from an injured workman, on a statutory subrogation basis, the amount of compensation it had paid to him. The Superior Court entered judgment for the insurance company and the workman appeals. We reverse.

I

The critical facts are undisputed: Dominick Baio (defendant) was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, for which he was entitled to receive Workmen’s Compensation. 19 Del.C. § 2304. Baio was paid compensation by Commercial Union Insurance Co. (plaintiff), the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Meehan v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Curtis v. Simpson ChevroletDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Klein v. American Luggage Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  5. John Leonard Mize v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Rhoad v. McLEAN TRUCKING COMPANYWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Jeffries v. Kent County Vocational Technical School District Board of EducationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1999
  3. Brown v. LeightonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Old Republic Insurance Co. v. AshleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  5. Keeler v. Harford Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API