Baio v. Commercial Union Insurance
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the CourtDuffy, Justice
(for the majority):
The issue in this case concerns the right of an insurance company to recover from an injured workman, on a statutory subrogation basis, the amount of compensation it had paid to him. The Superior Court entered judgment for the insurance company and the workman appeals. We reverse.
I
The critical facts are undisputed: Dominick Baio (defendant) was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, for which he was entitled to receive Workmen’s Compensation. 19 Del.C. § 2304. Baio was paid compensation by Commercial Union Insurance Co. (plaintiff), the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Meehan v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Curtis v. Simpson ChevroletDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Klein v. American Luggage Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- John Leonard Mize v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rhoad v. McLEAN TRUCKING COMPANYWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Jeffries v. Kent County Vocational Technical School District Board of EducationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1999
- Brown v. LeightonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Old Republic Insurance Co. v. AshleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
- Keeler v. Harford Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.