Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sventko v. Kroger Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1976No. Docket 25227Published

1ConcurrenceAllen, J.

I agree with the result reached by Judge Holbrook but believe some additional comments may be helpful in this case of first impression.1 Although the complaint alleges *650that plaintiffs discharge "was caused solely by the filing of plaintiff’s lawful claim for Workmen’s Compensation” the facts set forth in the bill disclose an equally plausible and legitimate reason for terminating the at-will employment relationship, viz.: that defendant was apprehensive that upon re-employment, plaintiff would sustain an aggravation or reoccurrence of the original low back injury. Given the high cost of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API