Legal Opinion
Karibian v. Columbia University
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 28, 1996No. 91 Civ. 3153 (TPG)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIESA, Chief Judge.
This is an action to recover damages for alleged sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and state law. Plaintiff Sharon Karibian brought suit against the alleged perpetrator, Mark Urban; against Columbia University, the former employer of Karibian and Urban; and against John Borden, a vice president at Columbia. The action has been tried. The jury returned its verdict on February 13, 1996, and certain of the parties have made post-trial motions.
The Issues At Trial
The issues in the case were narrowed somewhat…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Susan Waltman v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Annabelle Lipsett v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kate Frazier v. Fairhaven School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Hicks v. IBMDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Lewis v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Katt v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Bush v. Raymond Corp., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.