Legal Opinion

W. Hobart Pierce, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Richard L. Pierce, Deceased v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1983No. 82-5424PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVELY, Chief Judge.

This is the second appeal in this action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 and 2671 (1976). The plaintiffs-appellants are the personal representatives of the pilot and five passengers in a small airplane, all of whom died in the crash of the plane on April 11, 1976. The facts are set forth in this court’s earlier opinion. See Pierce v. United States, 679 F.2d 617 (6th Cir.1982).

I

In finding for the defendant following a seven-day trial the district court determined that the plaintiffs had failed to prove the actual cause of the crash and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Northern Indiana Transit, Inc. v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Tabor v. Continental Baking CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. New York Central R. Co. v. CAVINDER, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Swanson v. Slagal, AdministratrixIndiana Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Spurgin-Dienst v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Wojciechowicz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
  3. Webb v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1994
  4. Pinchback v. Armistead Homes Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1988
  5. Spurgin-Dienst v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API