Legal Opinion
Pinchback v. Armistead Homes Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 23, 1988No. Civ. B-81-1334PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER E. BLACK, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff Karen Pinchback 1 brings this action against defendants Armistead Homes Corporation (“Armistead”) and Diane Dailey, alleging that defendants discriminated against her on the basis of race in the sale of housing by depriving her of a residence in the Armistead Gardens development in Baltimore, Maryland. The Court has conducted a bench trial in this case and herein states its findings of fact and conclusions of law. Pinchback states causes of action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1982 and under Section 25 of Article 49B of the Annotated Code of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pinchback v. Armistead Homes Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. J. Rogers Badgett, Sr., D/B/A Georgetown Apartments Jean BrittainCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Inland Mediation Board v. City of PomonaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Williams v. Poretsky Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Portee v. HastavaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.