Legal Opinion
Atneosen v. XPT, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 3, 2022No. 4:21-cv-05250Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STEVEN ATNEOSEN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05250-DMR 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON MOTION TO REMAND 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 11 10 XPT, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiffs Steven Atneosen and Amer Akhtar filed this breach of contract and employment 13 discrimination case on March 22, 2021 in Santa Clara County Superior Court against Defendants 14 XPT, Inc., XPT Limited, NIO USA, Inc., and NIO Inc. XPT Limited removed the action on the 15 basis of diversity jurisdiction, asserting that there is complete diversity between the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.