Legal Opinion

Swett v. Gray

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1903No. L.A. No. 1120PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

—Seduction. The cause was tried by a jury, and plaintiff had the verdict assessing “the amount of damages at the sum of eight thousand two hundred and fifty dollars, as compensatory damages, and five thousand and fifty dollars as exemplary damages.” Judgment was entered that plaintiff recover from defendant “the sum of thirteen thousand and three hundred dollars,” and costs assessed, etc. Defendant moved for a new trial, and on hearing the motion the court, on May 4, 1901, “ordered that a new trial be granted, unless plaintiff, within ten days, in writing, remits all of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Valentine v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. American Type Founders' Co. v. PackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Warner v. F. Thomas Parisian Dyeing & Cleaning WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Koyer v. McComberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Turner v. WhittelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API