Legal Opinion

State v. Smith, 22434 (10-24-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 2008No. 22434PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Roneld Smith appeals from his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, possession of cocaine, and possession of a firearm while under a disability pursuant to his no-contest pleas. After Smith was sentenced, he appealed and filed the videotape of a pretrial suppression hearing as the record in this case. Smith's brief did not attach a transcript of the videotape as required by the appellate rule. See App. 9(A).

{¶ 2} The facts developed at the suppression hearing are not in dispute and are set out in the parties' briefs.

{¶ 3} Officer Jason Tipton, a five-and-a-half-year veteran…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. HardingOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. GardnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. Walker-StokesOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. Williams, 22535 (11-21-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API