State v. Smith, 22434 (10-24-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Roneld Smith appeals from his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, possession of cocaine, and possession of a firearm while under a disability pursuant to his no-contest pleas. After Smith was sentenced, he appealed and filed the videotape of a pretrial suppression hearing as the record in this case. Smith's brief did not attach a transcript of the videotape as required by the appellate rule. See App. 9(A).
{¶ 2} The facts developed at the suppression hearing are not in dispute and are set out in the parties' briefs.
{¶ 3} Officer Jason Tipton, a five-and-a-half-year veteran…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. HardingOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. GardnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Walker-StokesOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Williams, 22535 (11-21-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.